<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gartner Supports Collanos Business Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.collanos.com/2006/11/27/gartner-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.collanos.com/2006/11/27/gartner-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/</link>
	<description>- think out of the inbox -</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CM</title>
		<link>http://blog.collanos.com/2006/11/27/gartner-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/#comment-23341</link>
		<dc:creator>CM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.collanos.com/index.php/2006/11/27/gartner%e2%80%99s-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/#comment-23341</guid>
		<description>Hello Collanos,
I'm very excited about your product. It seems to understand that the pre MS 'groove' had merit that cannot be done away with.
As for OpenSource...I would not be so fast to assume this approach benifits the project or end users. I would suggest a base product plus 'market place' features. (I am not alone, when I say I would pay for a product that enhances my work. ) Between OpenSource &#38; say 'Force.com' there is a large gap that the Groove Marketplace could have served. It seems that Collanos may be positioned for a big future.
Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Collanos,<br />
I&#8217;m very excited about your product. It seems to understand that the pre MS &#8216;groove&#8217; had merit that cannot be done away with.<br />
As for OpenSource&#8230;I would not be so fast to assume this approach benifits the project or end users. I would suggest a base product plus &#8216;market place&#8217; features. (I am not alone, when I say I would pay for a product that enhances my work. ) Between OpenSource &amp; say &#8216;Force.com&#8217; there is a large gap that the Groove Marketplace could have served. It seems that Collanos may be positioned for a big future.<br />
Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sjølin</title>
		<link>http://blog.collanos.com/2006/11/27/gartner-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/#comment-20087</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sjølin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.collanos.com/index.php/2006/11/27/gartner%e2%80%99s-prediction-strongly-supports-the-collanos-business-model/#comment-20087</guid>
		<description>Dear Collanos Team,

I agree with the Gartner Analysis but I do also imagine that Collaonos could become more successful if Collanos focused on developing an OpenSource development strategy as the one SUN Microsystem uses for StarOffice / OpenOffice.

I believe so because the open source community would develop and embed Collanos technology into other open source products assist the Collanos team with innovation.

Best regards.
Peter Sjoelin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Collanos Team,</p>
<p>I agree with the Gartner Analysis but I do also imagine that Collaonos could become more successful if Collanos focused on developing an OpenSource development strategy as the one SUN Microsystem uses for StarOffice / OpenOffice.</p>
<p>I believe so because the open source community would develop and embed Collanos technology into other open source products assist the Collanos team with innovation.</p>
<p>Best regards.<br />
Peter Sjoelin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
